Steve caught Alex coloring on the side of the house with a black crayon yesterday.
"Hey!" Steve reprimanded him. "You don't do that!! You don't color on the side of the house! Come on, you know better. You know the rules."
"When do I get to make the rules?" Alex sulked.
"You don't. I make the rules. Mommy makes the rules. And at school, your teachers make the rules. When you grow up, you can make the rules. Our job is to teach you what the rules are so you can learn to get along with other people. And nobody is going to get along with you if you're busy writing your name on the side of their house."
Alex didn't like this at all, and why should he? It hardly seems fair to never get to make any rules of his own that Steve and I would be obligated to follow. Unfortunately for Alex and Christopher, that's the way it works in our house.
As far as discipline goes, Steve and I fall in that middle ground of parenting styles, where we don't spank but don't go for that whole non-coercive parenting method, either, where you never put your foot down and tell your lippy five year old to get the hell in the car because today's the day for their brother's doctors appointment and in case they were wondering, the magic word is now.
The way I look at it is this: It is the parent's (utterly thankless) job to guide their Tazmanian Devils toward a type of behavior that won't get them arrested, thrown out of bars, or have various social service agencies after them with past due notices for child support while at the same time imbuing them with a sense of adventure, curiosity, and a strong will that goes with a high sense of self worth. It is in their best interest to trust us, to trust that we love them and that we regard their well-being as our highest priority.
So what do you do when one child will not stop pulling the other's hair, or one refuses to quit playing in the middle of the road, or one thinks it's hilarious to unbuckle himself or his brother out of the carseat and tumble all over the station wagon when it's hurtling down the expressway? How do you get the message across that their behavior can not and will not be tolerated and it needs to stop right this instant? And most importantly, where is that razor's edge of a line that we must walk that separates ineffective pleading with the little criminals from a crushing authoritarianism that breaks their spirit?
Here's the completely wretched, yet totally true answer: There isn't a magic tool you can use or set of words you can say that will get them to stop incessantly pushing the power button on your computer before they destroy your hard drive. With Alex, I searched for the magical solution for over two years. I tried yelling (and um, still try yelling sometimes. Never works.) I tried speaking in a very soft, very serious voice. I tried reasoning. I tried BECAUSE I SAID SO. (this actually sometimes works, if your aim is to get your child to just shut up for one red hot minute.) I tried sitting on him. I tried making him stand in a corner. God help me, I even spanked him once. And then I learned that he had a behavioral disorder, that he is unable to process what I'm saying, no matter how loudly I say it. That sometimes he is physically unable to calm down. That he has a genuine problem with impulse control and writes on the walls, only to wonder later why he would do such a thing. Though therapy, I learned the only thing that really works with Alex is redirection and antecedent planning, i.e. - if I'm taking him somewhere where he needs to be quiet, bring a toy or coloring materials to help him successfully behave himself. Don't send him into as attorney's office for a meeting and expect him to sit quietly for an hour. It's not possible.
We tried the same thing with Christopher, and yes, it works, but you know what else works with him? Making him stand in the corner. It just kills him to have to stand in the corner, and he is very, very sorry he pulled Alex's hair, and won't do it again! Just don't make him stand in the corner! Different children are different people and require different solutions, and damn it, that's hard! That requires a lot of energy and thought and work, and who the hell has time for that? I sure don't. It would have been much easier to have broken their spirits from the get-go, once I got over the obstacle of killing my self-respect and learned to ignore the gnawing ache in my soul that often accompanies the guilt and self-loathing a decent person feels when inflicting deliberate cruelty onto another human being.
Discussions surrounding creative discipline have been all the rage this summer, led by Christian fundamentalist Lisa Whelchel, former child star of the sitcom The Facts of Life and author of Creative Discipline. I had thought I was learning to be creative with my silver dollar buzzwords and catchphrases like "redirection" and "antecedent planning", but that's just pattycake compared to Whelchel's advice. You see, inspired creativity, the kind that's truly memorable, can often be cruel. And by her fundamentalist logic, if cruelty aids in obedience, then cruelty is good.
The most talked about of Whelchel's discipline methods* is sprinkling hot sauce on children's tongues for swearing and lying and backtalk. Steve had a roommate who used to do this to her dog, an American Eskimo who was prone to shrill yapping early in the morning. It didn't work on the dog, who was barking because it had to pee. Steve's roommate put hot sauce on the dog's tongue because she was too lazy and hung over to get up and walk the animal she willingly agreed to take responsibility for. What would have worked better on Daisy the dog? Boring old antecendent planning. Don't get so drunk you can't walk your own dog. Same with a child. Hurting a child by dousing their tongue in a fiery chemical is lazy parenting. You are one lazy mofo, Whelchel.
But Blair doesn't stop with giving bad press to the Tabasco company, no.**
"If your child won't hold your hand across the street, hold her hair," she blithely instructs. "If your child plays with matches, burn a favorite toy to teach him a lesson."
Burn a favorite toy to teach him a lesson. Think about that.
Alex has a Special Blanket. He's had it since he was born and sleeps with it every night. Steve and I refuse to let him take it out of the house (the only exception to that was when I was giving birth to his brother and he had to spend the night at his Uncle Dan's)
He LOVES this blanket, y'all. He needs it. He holds it in his arms when he sleeps at night. He can not sleep without it. The bond he has with this blanket is so strong that I know he'll love it forever, even when he's too grown up to admit it. I plan to save it for him in my cedar chest so he'll always know where it is, no matter where he goes or how old he is. That blanket is home. That blanket is love. That blanket is emotional security and comfort. It's a beacon of his childhood, when the world as he saw it was a simple place, and people were mostly good. When he leaves childhood behind and walks down the path to whatever life stretches out in front of him, that blanket will be one of the lights that he will see shine when he turns back to remember. It is one of the roots that allows him to stretch up and high while still providing the security of a familar past.
And one by one those lights will wink out on him: Steve and I will sell his childhood home, Steve will die, I will die, Christopher will grow up and leave him to live his own life. But if I'm careful, and if he can dig in the cedar chest past my vibrator without freaking out, he'll find that one small piece of simple love left.
And I'm supposed to set it on fire to teach him a routine lesson?
Seriously, what lesson would I be teaching him? That I'm an inhuman monster? What if I had come across Whelchel's book and burned his blanket before I learned of his disability? What then?
One of the customer reviews of Whelchel's book on the Amazon web site was glowingly positive, admonishing parents like me who are horrified by these practices to "grow up and be a parent".
If being a parent means manifesting frightening, abusive, totalitarian control over my small boy, who is more baby than man, then I will renounce the title of parent immediately.
I will never understand why we, as a secular nation, tolerate the subjugation and abuse of human beings in the name of religious freedom and "traditional values". I'm not a religious person. I would never be able to sleep at night after doing something that wicked. And inflicting that kind of psychological abuse on a small child in the name of love is wicked, no doubt. But I'm not a fundamentalist Christian. I can't pawn off my abusive behavior on God and say I'm just following orders from the man upstairs, so what can I do? I have to take responsibility for my actions. And my responsibility to my boys is to make them into men who will not inflict cruelty onto those smaller and weaker than they in the name of "following orders". Men who will question authority when said authority seems to be getting out of hand rather than displaying a blind obedience forced into them when they were babies. Men who can make their own decisions about their destiny. Men who have the courage to refuse to be sent to a foreign country to kill innocent people under clearly false pretenses.
But go ahead and yank your kids across the street by their hair, Whelchel. I can't stop you. Just stop pretending Jesus told you to do it.
*************************************************
*and, of course, that of her husband. Welchel may have written the book on creative
**The makers of Tabasco, the most popular brand of hot sauce, have issued a public statement speaking out against the practice of "hot-saucing".






